Browse through the various sectors and categories available for this year's awards. You can now also nominate and add your preferred candidates directly to the official list.
The GRC & FinCrime Prevention Awards comprises of six categories of awards with various subcategories.
This award recognizes organizations that excel in governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) practices and are exemplary employers in these areas.
Asset Management
Organisational Excellence in Financial Crime Prevention
Judging Criteria
Entries will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. AML/CTF Programme Strength and Regulatory Compliance (25%)
Effectiveness of the institution’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) frameworks.
Compliance with local and global regulatory standards (e.g., FATF, EU AMLD, OFAC, FCA, FinCEN, MAS, CBN).
Outcomes of regulatory reviews, supervisory inspections, or enforcement resolutions.
2. Financial Crime Risk Management and Controls (20%)
Robustness of internal controls, financial crime risk assessments, and policies.
Governance of high-risk customer segments, politically exposed persons (PEPs), correspondent banking relationships, or cross-border activities.
3. Technology and Innovation (15%)
Use of RegTech, AI/ML, advanced analytics, or automation in transaction monitoring, screening, KYC/CDD, or fraud detection.
Integration of case management tools, data architecture improvements, or digital identity verification systems.
4. Organisational Culture and Training (15%)
Commitment to cultivating a strong compliance culture throughout the organisation.
Quality and frequency of financial crime prevention training for frontline staff, compliance teams, and senior management.
5. Collaboration and Public-Private Partnerships (15%)
Participation in joint investigations, financial intelligence sharing, or national/international task forces.
Contributions to public-private initiatives, typology reports, or financial crime policy development.
6. Measurable Outcomes and Impact (10%)
Demonstrable reduction in financial crime exposure, increased suspicious activity reporting (SAR) quality, or internal fraud prevention results.
Positive audit findings, enforcement case resolutions, client feedback, or internal key risk indicators (KRIs).
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Programme overviews, audit summaries, risk dashboards, training metrics, or internal policy extracts (appropriately anonymised).
Case studies on regulatory engagements, technology deployment, or fraud remediation.
External validations, awards, or media coverage.
Testimonials from regulators, partners, or stakeholders.
Organisational Excellence in Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC)
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Structure and Board Oversight (25%)
Strength and clarity of governance frameworks, board-level risk oversight, and committee structures.
Clear lines of accountability and decision-making for risk, compliance, and ethical conduct.
Integration of ESG, data governance, or whistleblower frameworks into governance systems.
Robust systems for tracking, interpreting, and implementing domestic and international regulatory requirements (e.g., Basel III, GDPR, IFRS9, AMLD, FCA/PRA rules).
Evidence of strong compliance monitoring, internal controls, breach management, and successful regulatory reviews or inspections.
4. Innovation and Integration of GRC Technology (15%)
Adoption of GRC platforms, automated workflows, regulatory change management tools, or compliance analytics.
Use of technology to unify risk, audit, legal, and compliance reporting and reduce operational silos.
5. Organisational Culture and Training (10%)
Programmes to promote ethical conduct, staff awareness, and values-based decision-making.
Frequency and effectiveness of governance, risk, and compliance training across employee levels.
6. Measurable Outcomes and Strategic Impact (10%)
Demonstrable impact on risk posture, compliance performance, audit outcomes, or operational resilience.
Improvements in stakeholder confidence, credit ratings, investor relations, or market positioning as a result of GRC excellence.
Supporting Materials (Optional):
GRC policy summaries, structure charts, ERM frameworks, compliance dashboards, or audit findings (anonymised where necessary).
Case studies on GRC transformation, technology adoption, or governance reforms.
Regulator or stakeholder testimonials, inspection outcomes, or industry benchmarking.
Awards, certifications (e.g., ISO 37301, ISO 31000), or independent assurance reports.
Official Nominees
Lotus Capital
Guaranty Trust Fund Managers
AXA Mansard Investments
ARM Investment Management
Chapel Hill Denham Management
United Capital Asset Management
FBNQuest Asset Management
Nigeria-Based Asset Managers
African Alliance Asset Management
Volition Cap
FSDH Asset Management
Quantum Zenith Asset Management & Investment
Meristem Wealth Management
Norrenberger Asset Management
Allan Gray
Ninety One (formerly Investec Asset Management)
Sanlam Investment Management
Old Mutual Investment Group
University of Abuja Teaching Hospital
Greenwich Hospital Lagos
Insurance
Organisational Excellence in Financial Crime Prevention
Judging Criteria
Entries will be evaluated based on the following six key criteria:
Implementation of a comprehensive framework for identifying, assessing, and mitigating financial crime risks.
Governance structure, policies, and board-level oversight of financial crime risk (e.g., AML, fraud, sanctions, bribery, corruption).
2. Regulatory Compliance and Oversight (20%)
Adherence to global and domestic financial crime-related regulations and guidance (e.g., FATF, FCA, NAIC, FINTRAC, MAS, OFSI, OFAC).
Results of regulatory reviews, audits, or successful remediation efforts.
3. Claims and Policyholder Fraud Prevention (15%)
Systems and controls to detect, investigate, and reduce fraudulent insurance claims and policy-level abuse.
Use of fraud analytics, red flag indicators, and industry databases (e.g., IFB, NICB, CUE, or equivalent).
4. AML/KYC and Customer Due Diligence (15%)
Risk-based KYC, onboarding, and enhanced due diligence (EDD) procedures for customers, agents, and third parties.
Effective implementation of customer screening, PEP management, and source-of-funds verification.
5. Technology and Innovation (15%)
Deployment of digital tools (e.g., RegTech, AI/ML, case management systems, biometrics) to enhance detection, surveillance, and reporting of suspicious activities.
Integration of fraud prevention and AML platforms across product lines or distribution channels.
6. Culture, Training, and Sector Contribution (10%)
Internal training, awareness campaigns, and culture-building initiatives that promote integrity and vigilance.
Collaboration with regulators, industry bodies, and public-private partnerships to improve sector-wide financial crime resilience.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Framework documents, audit reports, fraud prevention strategies, or policy summaries (anonymised as required).
Case studies, technology implementation reports, risk dashboards, or outcome metrics.
Testimonials from regulators, brokers, partners, or investigative bodies.
Awards, certifications (e.g., ISO 37001, ISO 31000, ICA, ACFCS, AGRC, ACAMS-accredited programmes), or industry recognition.
Organisational Excellence in Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC)
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Framework and Leadership Oversight (25%)
Clear board and senior leadership engagement in GRC strategy, ethics, and organisational accountability.
Strength and transparency of governance structures, including committee oversight, policy frameworks, and decision-making protocols.
2. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Maturity (20%)
Implementation of a risk management framework that addresses underwriting, operational, cyber, conduct, regulatory, ESG, and reputational risks.
Risk integration into business planning, product development, pricing, and distribution.
3. Regulatory Compliance and Control Effectiveness (20%)
Alignment with local and international regulatory frameworks (e.g., Solvency II, FCA, NAIC, MAS, PRA, APRA, EIOPA).
Internal compliance controls, breach management procedures, and audit outcomes demonstrating regulatory maturity.
4. Integration of GRC Technology and Innovation (15%)
Use of GRC platforms, automated compliance tools, risk dashboards, and AI/analytics to improve efficiency and oversight.
Digital transformation initiatives that enhance governance or risk transparency across the enterprise.
5. Culture, Conduct and Staff Engagement (10%)
Programmes to foster a culture of ethics, compliance, and risk-awareness across all levels of the organisation.
Training, whistleblower protections, and values-based leadership development.
6. Impact and Stakeholder Confidence (10%)
Measurable improvements in compliance outcomes, internal audit ratings, claims handling, customer satisfaction, or regulatory engagement.
Examples of how GRC strategies have enhanced trust with policyholders, partners, regulators, or rating agencies.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
GRC policy frameworks, ERM plans, compliance dashboards, board reports, or internal audit summaries (anonymised if necessary).
Case studies on GRC innovation, governance reform, or risk mitigation initiatives.
External audit results, regulatory correspondence, or stakeholder feedback.
Awards, accreditations, or certifications (e.g., ISO 31000, ISO 37301, Solvency II readiness, ESG frameworks).
Official Nominees
Sanlam
Old mutual life
Santam
Momentum Metropolitan Holdings (MML Group Limited)
Old Mutual Insure
OUTsurance Insurance
Guardrisk Life
Wafa Assurance
RMA (Royale Marocaine d’Assurance)
Mutuelle Taamine Chaabi
Axa Assurance Maroc
Sanlam Assurance (Morocco)
Misr Insurance
AtlantaSanad
Misr Life Insurance Company
Hollard Life Assurance
Centriq Insurance Company
Jubilee Insurance
Leadway Assurance Company Limited (Nigeria)
African Risk Capacity (ARC) Ltd
Britam Holdings Limited
AIICO Insurance Plc
Axa Mansard Insurance
Allianz Egypt
RMA Watanya
Discovery Limited
Microfinance Bank
Organisational Excellence in Financial Crime Prevention
Judging Criteria
This award is open to all internal compliance teams working outside of the financial services sector.
Entries must demonstrate evidence from the last 12 months, up to the awards entry deadline.
We welcome entries from teams operating within Nigeria.
The judging panel should assess the medical facility's comprehensive and effective GRC policy, innovative approaches, leadership commitment, staff training and awareness initiatives, utilization of performance metrics, external recognition, and incident response and adaptability when determining the recipient of the "Excellence in Healthcare Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC)" award.
Criteria for Selection:
Governance Practices: The organization demonstrates strong governance structures and practices, including effective oversight by the board of directors or governing body, clear accountability, and ethical decision-making processes. It fosters a culture of integrity, transparency, and accountability throughout the organization.
Risk Management: The organization implements proactive risk management practices to identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with utility operations, including but not limited to infrastructure maintenance, network reliability, supply chain management, and cybersecurity. It develops robust risk management strategies to ensure the continuity and resilience of utility services.
Compliance with Regulations: The organization maintains compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards governing utility services, including safety regulations, environmental standards, data privacy laws, and customer protection regulations. It ensures adherence to licensing requirements, permits, and reporting obligations.
Service Reliability: The organization prioritizes service reliability and continuity, implementing measures to prevent service disruptions, minimize downtime, and respond swiftly to emergencies or outages. It invests in infrastructure upgrades, maintenance programs, and contingency planning to enhance service reliability.
Customer Satisfaction: The organization is committed to meeting customer expectations and delivering high-quality utility services. It actively seeks feedback from customers, responds to complaints and inquiries promptly, and strives to improve customer satisfaction through innovative service offerings and enhanced customer experiences.
Safety Performance: The organization prioritizes safety as a core value, implementing rigorous safety protocols, training programs, and safety management systems to protect employees, contractors, customers, and the public from potential hazards and accidents associated with utility operations.
Environmental Stewardship: The organization demonstrates a commitment to environmental stewardship, minimizing the environmental impact of utility operations, promoting energy efficiency, reducing carbon emissions, and supporting sustainability initiatives in line with environmental regulations and industry best practices.
Innovation in GRC: The organization leverages innovation and technology to enhance GRC practices, including the use of data analytics, digital solutions, and predictive analytics to improve risk management, compliance monitoring, and decision-making processes.
Community Engagement: The organization actively engages with local communities, stakeholders, and regulatory authorities to build trust, address community concerns, and support community development initiatives. It demonstrates a commitment to corporate social responsibility and stakeholder engagement.
Financial Integrity: The organization maintains financial integrity and transparency, implementing sound financial controls, reporting mechanisms, and audit processes to ensure accurate financial reporting and compliance with accounting standards and regulations.
Industry Leadership: The organization serves as a leader in the utility sector, driving innovation, setting industry standards, and promoting best practices in governance, risk management, and compliance. It contributes to industry dialogue, collaboration, and knowledge sharing to advance the reliability, safety, and sustainability of utility services.
Organisational Excellence in Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC)
Judging Criteria
This award is open to all internal compliance teams working outside of the financial services sector.
Entries must demonstrate evidence from the last 12 months, up to the awards entry deadline.
We welcome entries from teams operating within Nigeria.
The judging panel should evaluate the medical facility's financial crime prevention policy for its comprehensiveness, effectiveness in detecting and preventing financial crimes such as fraud and money laundering, leadership commitment, staff training initiatives, utilization of technology and data analytics, adaptability to changing regulatory requirements, and any external certifications or industry recognition, when considering the recipient of the Award.
Criteria for Selection:
AML Compliance Program: The organization maintains a comprehensive AML compliance program that includes policies, procedures, and controls designed to detect and prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. The program is aligned with regulatory requirements and industry best practices.
Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Practices: The organization implements robust customer due diligence processes to verify the identities of customers, assess their risk profiles, and monitor their transactions for suspicious activity. It conducts enhanced due diligence for high-risk customers and beneficial owners.
Transaction Monitoring: The organization employs effective transaction monitoring systems and processes to identify and investigate potentially suspicious transactions. It utilizes advanced analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technologies to enhance the detection of unusual patterns and behaviors.
Suspicious Activity Reporting: The organization promptly reports suspicious transactions and activities to the relevant authorities, such as financial intelligence units or regulatory agencies, in compliance with regulatory requirements. It maintains accurate records of suspicious activity reports (SARs) and supports law enforcement investigations as needed.
Training and Awareness: The organization provides ongoing training and awareness programs to employees and stakeholders on AML policies, procedures, and regulatory requirements. It ensures that employees understand their roles and responsibilities in preventing financial crime and reporting suspicious activities.
Technology and Innovation: The organization leverages technology and innovation to enhance its financial crime prevention capabilities, including the use of advanced analytics, artificial intelligence, and blockchain technology. It continuously evaluates and adopts emerging technologies to stay ahead of evolving threats.
Regulatory Engagement: The organization maintains open and constructive relationships with regulatory authorities, participating in regulatory consultations, examinations, and industry working groups. It proactively seeks guidance on regulatory developments and adapts its AML program accordingly.
Collaboration and Information Sharing: The organization collaborates with other utility service providers, industry associations, law enforcement agencies, and regulatory bodies to share information and best practices for combating financial crime. It contributes to industry-wide initiatives to enhance AML standards and practices.
Compliance Culture: The organization fosters a culture of compliance and integrity throughout the organization, with senior management setting the tone from the top. It encourages employees to report suspicious activities and unethical behavior through established channels and protects whistleblowers from retaliation.
Measurable Impact: The organization demonstrates measurable results and outcomes in its financial crime prevention efforts, including the reduction of money laundering risks, the detection and prevention of financial crimes, and the enhancement of regulatory compliance. It tracks key performance indicators and conducts periodic assessments of its AML program's effectiveness.
Official Nominees
Kuda Microfinance Bank
LAPO Microfinance Bank
Baobab Microfinance Bank
AB Microfinance Bank
Addosser Microfinance Bank
VFD Microfinance Bank (VBank)
Sparkle Microfinance Bank
Mainstreet Microfinance Bank
Accion Microfinance Bank
Fina Trust Microfinance Bank
Faulu Microfinance Bank
Kenya Women Microfinance Bank (KWFT)
SMEP Microfinance Bank
Rafiki Microfinance Bank
Branch Microfinance Bank
Caritas Microfinance Bank
Sumac Microfinance Bank
U & I Microfinance Bank
Maisha Microfinance Bank
Muungano Microfinance Bank
Advans Nigeria
Musoni Microfinance
BRAC Liberia & BRAC Tanzania
ACEP Burkina Faso
Renmoney Microfinance Bank
FINA TRUST MICROFINANCE BANK
Commercial Banks
Organisational Excellence in Financial Crime Prevention
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be assessed based on the following six core criteria:
1. Financial Crime Risk Framework and Governance (25%)
Implementation of a clear and comprehensive governance structure for managing financial crime risks.
Board-level engagement and executive accountability for AML, fraud prevention, sanctions, and corruption risk.
Clearly defined policies, roles, escalation processes, and risk appetite statements.
2. AML/CTF Programme Effectiveness (20%)
Strength of the bank’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing framework.
Effectiveness of transaction monitoring systems, customer risk assessments, suspicious activity reporting (SAR/STR), and remediation plans.
Evidence of alignment with national and international AML standards (e.g., FATF, Basel, EU AMLD, FinCEN, FCA, MAS, etc.).
3. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and KYC Controls (15%)
Implementation of risk-based CDD and enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk clients, jurisdictions, or products.
Onboarding protocols, beneficial ownership verification, PEP/sanctions screening, and ongoing monitoring practices.
4. Fraud and Cybercrime Prevention (15%)
Measures to detect and prevent internal and external fraud, social engineering, phishing, account takeovers, and digital identity fraud.
Integration of cybersecurity and anti-fraud systems into real-time operations.
5. Technology, Data & Innovation (15%)
Deployment of advanced analytics, AI/machine learning, RegTech, or automation to strengthen financial crime detection and compliance monitoring.
Use of integrated case management systems, risk intelligence tools, and collaborative platforms for internal and external reporting.
6. Regulatory Engagement and Sector Contribution (10%)
Evidence of strong regulatory relationships, clean audit outcomes, timely reporting, and participation in regulatory sandboxes or national risk assessments.
Involvement in industry working groups, public-private partnerships, and contribution to sector-wide financial crime prevention practices.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Internal financial crime policies, AML/CFT frameworks, audit findings, and risk reports (anonymised where appropriate).
Case studies, SAR/STR process overviews, fraud detection metrics, or remediation achievements.
Technology deployment summaries, training statistics, or regulatory feedback letters.
Certifications, awards, or public recognitions of excellence in compliance and anti-financial crime leadership.
Organisational Excellence in Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC)
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Framework and Ethical Oversight (25%)
Clear and effective governance structures, board-level accountability, and internal controls.
Evidence of leadership commitment to ethical conduct, transparency, and oversight.
Integration of ESG, data governance, whistleblowing, and stakeholder protections into governance practices.
2. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Strategy and Execution (20%)
Implementation of a comprehensive risk management framework covering credit, operational, market, liquidity, reputational, cyber, conduct, and ESG risks.
Use of risk appetite statements, key risk indicators (KRIs), stress testing, and scenario planning to inform business decisions.
3. Regulatory Compliance Programme Effectiveness (20%)
Strength of the bank’s compliance function in meeting domestic and international regulatory obligations (e.g., Basel III, GDPR, MiFID II, SOX, FCA, SEC, MAS).
Proactive compliance monitoring, remediation, and internal audit engagement.
Results from regulatory inspections, audits, or independent assurance reviews.
4. GRC Technology and Innovation (15%)
Adoption of digital platforms, RegTech tools, or integrated GRC systems to enhance efficiency, oversight, and risk transparency.
Use of real-time dashboards, automated reporting, or predictive analytics to support compliance and decision-making.
5. Culture, Conduct and Training (10%)
Evidence of a strong culture of compliance, risk awareness, and ethical behaviour across all levels.
Ongoing staff training programmes, leadership engagement, and communication strategies to embed GRC values.
6. Strategic Alignment and Stakeholder Impact (10%)
Demonstrated alignment of GRC with corporate strategy, business sustainability, and stakeholder expectations.
Enhanced institutional reputation, investor confidence, or customer trust as a result of GRC maturity.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Organisational charts, GRC policy summaries, ERM frameworks, compliance dashboards, or audit results (anonymised as required).
Case studies of governance or compliance transformation.
Staff training logs, whistleblower reports, or internal communications.
Industry awards, certifications (e.g., ISO 31000, ISO 37301), and recognitions of GRC leadership.
Official Nominees
Standard Bank Group
FirstRand Bank
Absa Group Limited
Nedbank Group
Access Bank Group
Zenith Bank
First Bank of Nigeria (FBN Holdings)
Guaranty Trust Holding Company (GTCO)
National Bank of Egypt (NBE)
Banque Misr
Commercial International Bank (CIB)
Attijariwafa Bank
Bank of Africa (formerly BMCE Bank)
Ecobank Transnational Incorporated
United Bank for Africa (UBA) – Nigeria
KCB Group
Equity Bank
Stanbic IBTC Bank
Mauritius Commercial Bank (MCB)
CRDB Bank
Pension Industry
Organisational Excellence in Financial Crime Prevention
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six key criteria:
1. Financial Crime Risk Framework and Governance (25%)
Existence of a formal financial crime prevention strategy with defined roles, board oversight, and escalation protocols.
Policies covering AML/CTF, fraud, bribery, corruption, sanctions, and third-party risk.
Evidence of governance accountability in protecting retirement funds.
2. Beneficiary Verification and Identity Controls (20%)
Measures to ensure accurate identification and verification of contributors, pensioners, and next-of-kin.
Use of biometric verification, digital ID systems, and controls to prevent impersonation or ghost beneficiaries.
3. AML/CTF Compliance and Monitoring (15%)
Compliance with applicable AML/CTF regulations and reporting obligations (e.g., FATF, local FIU guidance).
Suspicious transaction reporting (STR), transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening systems in place.
Clean audit results or positive regulatory reviews.
4. Fraud Prevention and Response (15%)
Internal controls and fraud detection systems to monitor pension contributions, withdrawals, and payouts.
Use of fraud analytics, hotlines, whistleblower protections, or case management systems.
Case examples of successful prevention, investigation, or prosecution.
5. Technology and Innovation (15%)
Deployment of RegTech or FinTech tools that enhance fraud risk management, secure data handling, and real-time alerts.
Integration of anti-fraud systems with payment platforms, fund administrators, or custodians.
6. Culture, Training, and Stakeholder Protection (10%)
Programmes that embed awareness and accountability in staff, retirees, and pension fund managers.
Financial literacy and fraud education campaigns targeting pensioners and contributors.
Collaboration with regulators, custodians, or industry bodies on sector-wide crime prevention.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Risk and compliance reports, fraud statistics, control frameworks, or audit results (anonymised where required).
Case studies of successful prevention or intervention efforts.
Technology deployment documentation, internal training records, or beneficiary communication materials.
Testimonials from pensioners, regulators, or partners.
Organisational Excellence in Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC)
Judging Criteria
Entries will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Framework and Board Oversight (25%)
Strength, independence, and accountability of governance structures, including board committees, trustee roles, and internal oversight.
Evidence of ethical leadership, board-level engagement, and transparency in reporting and decision-making.
2. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) (20%)
Implementation of a comprehensive ERM strategy addressing investment, operational, liquidity, compliance, ESG, and reputational risks.
Use of risk registers, key risk indicators (KRIs), risk appetite frameworks, and stress testing in decision-making.
3. Regulatory Compliance and Fiduciary Responsibility (20%)
Adherence to local and international pension, investment, and data protection regulations (e.g., SEC, PRA, FCA, PENCOM, ERISA, GDPR).
Ongoing compliance monitoring, audit trails, reporting obligations, and engagement with supervisory authorities.
4. GRC Technology and Integration (15%)
Deployment of systems or platforms that enhance risk monitoring, compliance automation, governance reporting, or internal controls.
Integration of GRC tools across investment operations, member services, and third-party oversight.
5. Culture, Conduct, and Stakeholder Confidence (10%)
Programmes promoting ethical conduct, risk awareness, and compliance culture among staff, leadership, and trustees.
Engagement with pension members and stakeholders to build trust, ensure accountability, and protect long-term value.
6. Measurable Impact and Performance (10%)
Demonstrated improvements in audit outcomes, risk mitigation, regulatory reviews, or member satisfaction.
Tangible benefits resulting from GRC integration, such as operational efficiency, fund security, or enhanced reporting accuracy.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Governance structure charts, GRC frameworks, risk management reports, internal/external audit results, or compliance dashboards (anonymised where needed).
Evidence of strategic reforms, board meeting minutes, policy updates, or investment oversight improvements.
Regulator feedback, independent assessments, stakeholder testimonials, or performance reviews.
Relevant certifications (e.g., ISO 37301, ISO 31000, governance accreditations).
Official Nominees
Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF)
Public Investment Corporation (PIC)
ABSA, Standard Bank, Nedbank
Stanbic IBTC Pension Managers
Leadway Pensure
First Pension Custodian
National Social Security Fund (NSSF)
Equity Bank, KCB Bank, Cooperative Bank
Stanbic Bank Botswana, ABSA
AXA Mansard Pension Limited
ARM Pension Manager Limited
Oak Pension
Leadway Pensure
Crusader Sterling Pension Limited
NLPC Pension Fund Administrator Limited
Fintech
Organisational Excellence in Financial Crime Prevention
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be assessed based on the following six core criteria:
1. Innovation and Technological Advancement (25%)
Originality and technical sophistication of the product, service, or platform in addressing one or more financial crime risks.
Use of emerging technologies (e.g., AI, machine learning, blockchain, biometrics, APIs, predictive analytics) to detect, prevent, or mitigate financial crime.
2. Effectiveness and Client Impact (20%)
Evidence of how the solution has improved client outcomes—such as enhanced risk detection, faster compliance processing, reduced false positives, or successful fraud interception.
Metrics, case studies, or client feedback demonstrating tangible results.
3. Regulatory Alignment and Compliance Support (15%)
Support for compliance with local and global financial crime regulations (e.g., FATF, AMLD, FinCEN, FCA, MAS, SEC).
Facilitation of regulatory reporting, audit readiness, or supervisory collaboration.
4. User Experience and Integration (15%)
Scalability, flexibility, and ease of use of the platform or solution.
Integration capabilities with core banking, payment systems, case management tools, or regulatory systems.
5. Contribution to Broader Financial Crime Ecosystem (15%)
Role in strengthening industry collaboration, public-private partnerships, open-source development, or data sharing initiatives.
Engagement with regulators, financial intelligence units (FIUs), law enforcement, or international organisations.
6. Ethical Standards and Data Governance (10%)
Commitment to responsible innovation, data privacy, cybersecurity, and ethical AI.
Measures to prevent algorithmic bias, protect user rights, and ensure transparency.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Product demos, solution brochures, implementation case studies, client references, or performance dashboards.
Whitepapers, regulatory sandbox results, or market recognition from industry analysts.
Certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, ISO 37301, SOC 2), awards, or regulator acknowledgments.
Testimonials from financial institutions, supervisory agencies, or platform users.
Organisational Excellence in Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC)
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Structure and Ethical Oversight (25%)
Implementation of robust governance frameworks, board or leadership accountability, and ethical oversight structures.
Evidence of responsible innovation, customer protection policies, conflict-of-interest management, and transparent reporting.
Governance of AI/algorithmic decisions, partnerships, and data use.
2. Risk Management Maturity (20%)
Comprehensive approach to enterprise risk management (ERM) covering financial, cyber, data, operational, market, third-party, and reputational risks.
Use of risk dashboards, scenario planning, and internal controls aligned with innovation goals.
3. Regulatory Compliance and Readiness (20%)
Compliance with local and cross-border regulatory regimes (e.g., GDPR, PSD2, AMLD, MiCA, FCA, SEC, MAS, CBN, ASIC).
Demonstrated success in audits, licensing, regulatory sandboxes, or supervisory engagements.
4. GRC Technology and Automation (15%)
Integration of automated compliance tools, RegTech/GRC platforms, audit trails, and real-time monitoring systems.
Use of AI/ML or blockchain to enhance transparency, accountability, and reporting.
5. Culture, Conduct and Internal Alignment (10%)
Promotion of a culture of compliance, ethics, and integrity across engineering, product, operations, and executive teams.
Internal communications, whistleblower protocols, and employee training initiatives.
6. Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency (10%)
Engagement with customers, regulators, investors, or industry groups to drive trust, clarity, and continuous improvement.
Transparent disclosures, governance communications, and ESG integration (if applicable).
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
GRC policies, org charts, risk frameworks, compliance reports, audit results, or governance board minutes (anonymised where required).
Technology architecture summaries, product risk assessments, or regulatory submissions.
Testimonials from regulators, clients, partners, or board members.
Certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, ISO 31000, ISO 37301, SOC 2) or recognition from industry watchdogs or alliances.
Official Nominees
Moniepoint
TymeBank
Flutterwave
FairMoney
M-Kopa
Minka
Paystack
Chipper Cash
Fawry
Onafriq
Cellulant
Jumo
Moove
Opay
Interswitch
Paga
Cowrywise
Palmpay
ESG initiative of the year
ESG initiative of the year
Judging Criteria
This award is open to all sector of industries in Nigeria
Entries must demonstrate evidence from the last 12 months, up to the awards entry deadline.
We welcome entries from teams operating within Nigeria.
The judging panel will consider how innovative approaches and technologies were used, the extent of international and local market collaboration involved, and how the initiative served to address common industry challenges related to ESG-related requirements or expectations. Judges will review projects that relate to all elements of Environmental, Social and Governance, - or one focused area as applicable.
Criteria for this award may include:
Impact and Results: Judges will evaluate the tangible outcomes and positive impact of the ESG initiative. This could include reductions in carbon emissions, improvements in social inclusion, or enhancements in governance practices.
Innovation: Judges will assess the originality and creativity of the initiative. They will look for evidence of unique approaches, pioneering technologies, or novel strategies employed to address ESG challenges.
Integration: The extent to which ESG considerations have been integrated into the organization's overall business strategy will be evaluated. This includes alignment with core business objectives and incorporation into decision-making processes.
Stakeholder Engagement: Judges will consider the level of engagement with stakeholders, including employees, investors, customers, and local communities. Strong communication and collaboration with these groups to advance ESG goals will be a key criterion.
Scalability and Replicability: The scalability and replicability of the initiative will be assessed. Judges will look for evidence that the initiative can be expanded across the organization or adapted by others in the industry to drive broader ESG impact.
Transparency and Reporting: The quality and transparency of reporting on ESG performance will be considered. Judges will evaluate the organization's ability to provide clear, accurate, and comprehensive disclosures on its ESG practices and outcomes.
Official Nominees
UBA
Stanbic IBTC
Fidelity
Wema Bank
Custodian Insurance
First Bank of Nigeria
Zenith Bank Plc
MRS
Seplat
Oando
Transcorp
Dangote Group
Unilever
Total
Nestle
Fidson
Cadbury
M-KOPA
PEG Africa
WiSolar
Ampli Energy
Growthpoint Properties
WBHO
Standard Bank Group
Absa / Rand Merchant Bank / BRED Madagasikara
Helios Investment Partners (CLEAR Fund)
Deloitte Ghana
MTN Group
Aviation & Aerospace
Governance , Risk and Compliance (GRC) & Financial Crime Prevention Excellence Award
Judging Criteria
Entries / Submissions will be evaluated based on the following key criteria:
1. Demonstrated Impact (25%)
Evidence of measurable improvements in compliance, risk mitigation, financial crime prevention, or audit outcomes.
Quantifiable reductions in fraud incidents, regulatory breaches, or operational losses.
2. Innovation and Strategic Approach (20%)
Implementation of cutting-edge technologies, processes, or partnerships (e.g., AI for fraud detection, digital identity systems, blockchain for compliance tracking).
Strategic alignment between GRC practices and broader organisational or regulatory goals.
3. Governance and Risk Culture (15%)
Demonstrated leadership in fostering an ethical and risk-aware culture across all organisational levels.
Integration of governance and risk management into daily operations and decision-making processes.
4. Cross-Functional and Regulatory Collaboration (15%)
Engagement with stakeholders including regulators, industry bodies, law enforcement, and global partners to improve compliance and financial crime prevention.
Active participation in aviation GRC task forces, regulatory working groups, or anti-money laundering (AML) networks.
5. Sustainability and Resilience (15%)
Long-term integration of GRC frameworks that support sustainable growth, safety, and operational resilience.
Examples of successful recovery from risk events (e.g., cyberattack, fraud case, regulatory audit) due to effective governance systems.
6. Leadership, Advocacy & Influence (10%)
Individual or organisational influence in shaping GRC and financial crime prevention best practices across the aviation sector.
Evidence of thought leadership, industry training, or advocacy on ethical compliance and fraud deterrence.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Case studies, audit reports, risk dashboards, training material, or testimonials.
Metrics showcasing before-and-after scenarios or comparative performance benchmarks.
Media coverage, press releases, or industry recognition.
Official Nominees
Civil Aviation Safety and Security Oversight Agency (CASSOA)
Denel Aeronautics (South Africa)
Paramount Group (South Africa)
Aerosud (South Africa)
Banjul Accord Group Aviation Safety Oversight Organisation (BAGASOO)
OR Tambo International Airport
African Airlines Association (AFRAA)
Cirium–AFRAA Data Partnership
SGS Aviation Compliance
ICAO RASG–AFI (Regional Aviation Safety Group – Africa & Indian Ocean)
Kenya Airways
Air Botswana
South African Airways
TAAG Angola Airlines
EgyptAir
ASECNA (Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar)
Entries will be judged based on the following criteria:
1. Governance and Compliance Excellence (20%)
Strong evidence of implementing or enhancing corporate governance and regulatory compliance frameworks.
Proactive responses to local and international transportation regulations, safety standards, and ethical requirements.
Examples of internal control improvements and compliance audit success.
2. Financial Crime Prevention Strategy (20%)
Demonstrated initiatives to identify, manage, and reduce exposure to financial crimes such as fraud, money laundering, procurement corruption, or asset misappropriation.
Deployment of monitoring systems, data analytics, or red flag indicators for early detection and prevention.
Collaboration with law enforcement, financial institutions, or regulatory bodies in investigations or enforcement actions.
3. Risk Management Impact (20%)
Development or refinement of enterprise or operational risk management frameworks addressing transport-specific threats (e.g., cargo fraud, cyberattacks, geopolitical disruptions, climate risks).
Risk mapping, mitigation strategies, and real-world examples of crisis avoidance or recovery due to effective planning.
4. Innovation and Technology Use (15%)
Use of advanced technologies (e.g., AI, machine learning, blockchain, digital identity tools, GPS tracking, or automated audit systems) to improve compliance, reduce fraud risk, or monitor transport operations.
Digital transformation aligned with GRC and financial crime prevention objectives.
5. Organisational Culture and Ethics (15%)
Initiatives that embed GRC and ethical values into organisational culture, staff training, and leadership accountability.
Evidence of whistleblower protection frameworks, anti-corruption campaigns, or behavioural change efforts.
6. Industry Influence and Collaboration (10%)
Contribution to industry-wide standards, working groups, or partnerships that promote good governance, regulatory resilience, or financial integrity in the transportation sector.
Influence on peers or policymakers through advocacy, education, or knowledge-sharing platforms.
Supporting Documentation (Optional but Encouraged):
Internal audit reports, GRC dashboards, fraud detection tools, training materials, case studies, or risk registers.
Impact metrics or testimonials from regulators, partners, or stakeholders.
Media coverage or industry recognitions.
Official Nominees
Transnet SOC Ltd
Djibouti Ports & Free Zones Authority
Imperial Logistics
Bolloré Africa Logistics
Ethiopian Shipping and Logistics Services Enterprise
Port of Mombasa – Kenya Ports Authority
Afripol (AU Police Cooperation Mechanism)
Nigeria Railway Corporation
ASECNA
Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority
Emerging Talent / Rising Star Awards
Governance , Risk and Compliance (GRC) & Financial Crime Prevention
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be assessed based on the following key criteria:
1. Demonstrated Impact (25%)
Evidence of meaningful contributions to a GRC, compliance, or financial crime prevention initiative, project, or function.
Positive change brought about by the nominee’s work (e.g., improved compliance, risk reduction, increased awareness, or technology adoption).
2. Initiative and Innovation (20%)
Willingness to go beyond the scope of assigned duties by proactively identifying problems, proposing solutions, or introducing fresh ideas.
Examples of creativity or new approaches in tackling GRC challenges, including digital solutions, ESG integration, or data-driven insights.
3. Learning and Development (15%)
Commitment to continuous learning through certifications, training, research, or professional development in GRC or financial crime prevention.
Involvement in industry events, thought leadership, mentoring, or contributions to professional communities.
4. Leadership Potential (15%)
Demonstration of early leadership qualities such as influencing others, collaborating across teams, or leading initiatives.
Recognition by peers or supervisors for attitude, integrity, and potential for future leadership.
5. Values and Ethics (15%)
Strong adherence to ethical standards and organisational values.
Advocating for transparency, accountability, anti-corruption, or ethical conduct in day-to-day operations.
6. Industry Engagement and Visibility (10%)
Active participation in professional networks, industry forums, student societies, or awareness campaigns related to GRC and financial crime prevention.
Recognition or awards from employers, professional bodies, or industry groups.
Supporting Documentation (Optional but Encouraged):
Testimonials from managers, mentors, or stakeholders.
Samples of work or project summaries.
Professional development records or certifications (e.g., AGRC, ICA, ACAMS, ACFCS, CFE, ISO certifications).
Press coverage, event participation, or internal recognition awards.
Official Nominees
Dylan Mouton (Namibia)
Cheng Hao (Nigeria)
Vanevola Otieno (Kenya)
Oboikanyo Kekana (South Africa) – Senior Compliance Officer at SAVA (ex-FIC)
Tasneem Gangat (South Africa) – Head of Compliance at Sanlam Glacier
Manet Basson (South Africa)
Femi Olayiwola (Nigeria)
Doyin Awoyinfa (Nigeria)
Emily Mochama (Kenya) – CCO at Afriex Inc
Nthabeleng Likotsi (South Africa) – Finance co‑op founder and GRC advocate
Submissions will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
1. Measurable Impact (25%)
Demonstrable results from the team’s work in improving risk oversight, regulatory compliance, fraud detection/prevention, or operational resilience.
Examples of financial savings, risk reduction, audit improvements, regulatory engagement success, or enhanced stakeholder confidence.
2. Collaboration and Teamwork (20%)
Evidence of strong internal collaboration, communication, and synergy across team members and departments.
Examples of how the team overcame silos, adapted to challenges, and worked cohesively to achieve shared goals.
3. Innovation in Practice (15%)
Use of innovative tools, technologies, or methodologies to drive efficiencies or enhance GRC and financial crime prevention processes.
Forward-thinking approaches to issues such as ESG risks, digital compliance, third-party risk, or AI-driven monitoring.
4. Leadership and Culture (15%)
Role of the team in promoting a culture of ethics, compliance, and accountability throughout the organisation.
Leadership in setting standards, mentoring others, and modelling best practices in governance and risk behaviours.
5. Agility and Responsiveness (15%)
The team’s ability to respond to crises, changing regulations, emerging threats, or operational disruptions (e.g., post-incident response, regulatory audits, internal investigations, etc.).
Examples of timely interventions or recovery actions led by the team.
6. Stakeholder and Industry Engagement (10%)
Evidence of the team’s role in cross-functional, cross-sector, or regulatory collaborations that influence or improve industry GRC and financial crime practices.
Engagement in policy consultations, knowledge-sharing forums, or public-private partnerships.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Case studies, team bios, project dashboards, visuals, and outcome reports.
Testimonials from leadership, stakeholders, or regulatory bodies.
Internal or external recognitions, audit outcomes, or independent validations of impact.
Official Nominees
RSM South Africa Risk & Compliance Team
Protiviti Africa Internal Audit Team
Aon Africa Risk Financing & Compliance Team
Boston Consulting Group Risk & Governance Team
McKinsey Africa Compliance & Risk Team
Access Bank Group Compliance Team (Nigeria)
Absa–SymphonyAI Compliance Team (South Africa)
Standard Bank Group GRC Team (South Africa)
Stanbic IBTC Compliance Team (Nigeria)
Leadway Assurance GRC Team (Nigeria)
GIABA AML/CFT Regional Team (West Africa)
Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU)
Africa Finance Corporation Risk & Governance Team
Nefco Ethics & Compliance Team (Nordic with African projects)
Deloitte Africa GRC Advisory Team
KPMG Africa Risk & Compliance Team
EY Africa Governance & Compliance Team
PwC Africa ESG & Regulatory Team
SymphonyAI–Absa Implementation Team
GTBank AML/Financial Crime Team (Nigeria)
Influencer of the Year Award
GRC & Financial Crime Prevention Influencer Awards in Africa
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be assessed using the following key criteria:
1. Thought Leadership and Expertise (25%)
Demonstrated subject-matter expertise in governance, risk, compliance, or financial crime prevention.
Influential publications, articles, webinars, interviews, or policy contributions that advance knowledge in the field.
2. Influence and Reach (20%)
Significant audience reach across digital platforms, media outlets, professional forums, or events.
Track record of building engaged communities and catalysing discussions around key GRC and financial crime topics.
3. Impact on Policy or Practice (20%)
Tangible examples of influence on policies, standards, organisational practices, or industry direction.
Involvement in advisory boards, government consultations, regulatory reform, or cross-industry collaboration.
4. Advocacy and Ethical Leadership (15%)
Strong advocacy for transparency, anti-corruption, inclusion, and ethical conduct in financial systems and corporate governance.
Championing of underrepresented voices or pressing issues (e.g., ESG risk, AI ethics, AML gaps, data protection).
5. Engagement and Education (10%)
Contribution to professional development, capacity building, or public awareness (e.g., training programs, workshops, mentoring, campaigns).
Collaboration with professional bodies, academic institutions, or civil society to amplify impact.
6. Authenticity and Integrity (10%)
Recognition for consistent, values-driven communication and influence.
Upholding of professional ethics, factual accuracy, and a constructive tone in advocacy efforts.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Links to media features, publications, blogs, interviews, or event recordings.
Social media metrics (e.g., following, engagement), campaign summaries, or community feedback.
Testimonials from industry peers, partners, or beneficiaries.
Proof of involvement in working groups, advisory roles, or institutional change initiatives.
Official Nominees
Ivy Wanjiru (Kenya)
Moses Mukisa (Uganda)
Cecilia Akintomide (Nigeria)
Nkiru Balonwu (Nigeria)
Ije Jidenma (Nigeria)
Amina Sambo‐Magaji, PhD (Nigeria)
Sherifah Tumusiime (Uganda)
Najwa El Iraki (Morocco)
Sophia Bekele (Ethiopia)
Nj Ayuk (Cameroon)
Tony Elumelu (Nigeria)
Vusi Thembekwayo (South Africa)
Khadija Sharife (South Africa)
Obadare Peter Adewale (Nigeria)
Adedoyin Odunfa (Nigeria)
Temitope Yusuff (Nigeria)
Cheng Hao (Nigeria)
Alex Ude (Nigeria)
Ikenna Ndugbu (Nigeria)
Busola Jejelowo (Nigeria)
Internal Audit and Assurance Award
Internal Audit & Assurance Champions Awards
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be evaluated against the following criteria:
1. Audit Excellence and Execution (25%)
Delivery of high-quality audit plans, reports, and assurance reviews that demonstrate depth, clarity, and value-added insights.
Examples of risk-based audits, root-cause analysis, or real-time assurance activities that improved organisational GRC posture.
2. Financial Crime Risk Identification & Mitigation (20%)
Success in identifying control weaknesses, fraud vulnerabilities, AML/CFT deficiencies, or non-compliance that could lead to financial crime or reputational damage.
Tangible improvements made following audit recommendations or interventions.
3. Innovation in Audit Practice (15%)
Adoption of innovative audit methodologies, data analytics, continuous monitoring tools, or AI to enhance audit accuracy and coverage.
Implementation of technology-enabled or agile audit processes aligned with GRC trends.
4. Cross-Functional Collaboration (15%)
Effective collaboration with risk, compliance, finance, operations, or external regulators in achieving integrated assurance objectives.
Contributions to enterprise risk management and internal controls improvement across departments.
5. Strategic Value and Organisational Impact (15%)
Evidence of internal audit’s influence on executive decision-making, policy reform, or organisational strategy.
Role in shaping governance structures, assurance maturity, or risk intelligence culture.
6. Professionalism and Ethical Conduct (10%)
Demonstrated commitment to the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (IPPF), IIA Code of Ethics, or equivalent standards.
Reputation for independence, objectivity, and professionalism in audit execution and stakeholder communication.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Audit summaries, assurance dashboards, executive briefings, or key findings (appropriately anonymised).
Testimonials from senior leadership, audit committees, or external stakeholders.
Metrics showing control enhancements, risk rating improvements, or fraud prevention outcomes post-audit.
Tools or frameworks developed to support audit innovation or assurance transformation.
Official Nominees
Denish Osodo
Charles Lang’at
Kenneth Njoroge Gitau
Gideon Mwongela David
Vincent Mutisya
Karen Muka
Fred Wasike
Andre Nel
Moses Mbedhli
Monwabisi Kula
Adinda Louw
Mmathabo Nkuna
Moses Muli Mulonzia
Moreen Mwende Namu
Annet Wanjiku Mburu
David Mwangi
Humphrey Muriuki
Stanbic Bank Kenya Internal Audit Team
Safaricom Group Internal Audit Function
Kenya Dairy Board Internal Audit Team
Financial Crime Prevention Leadership Award
Financial Crime and Fraud Prevention Leader
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be judged based on the following key criteria:
1. Strategic Leadership and Vision (25%)
Evidence of leading or driving large-scale financial crime prevention initiatives or transformation programmes.
Influence in setting strategic direction for fraud risk management, AML compliance, investigations, or financial integrity policy.
Visionary leadership in navigating complex or high-risk environments.
2. Operational Impact and Results (20%)
Demonstrable outcomes such as improved fraud detection rates, successful criminal investigations, financial recovery, strengthened controls, or reduced regulatory exposure.
Case examples of operational excellence, enforcement success, or post-incident recovery led by the nominee.
3. Collaboration and Industry Influence (20%)
Active involvement in public-private partnerships, inter-agency collaboration, cross-border initiatives, or industry taskforces.
Contributions to global or regional AML/CTF frameworks, fraud intelligence sharing platforms, or regulatory reform.
4. Innovation and Adaptability (15%)
Introduction or championing of advanced tools, methodologies, or digital solutions (e.g., machine learning for fraud detection, blockchain analytics, KYC automation).
Response to emerging threats such as cyber-enabled financial crimes, crypto fraud, or pandemic-related scams.
5. Advocacy, Mentorship and Capacity Building (10%)
Commitment to mentoring future professionals, building internal capabilities, or influencing a culture of compliance and ethical leadership.
Public speaking, publishing, or educational efforts to promote awareness and resilience.
6. Integrity and Ethical Leadership (10%)
Consistent demonstration of integrity, objectivity, and ethical conduct in decision-making and leadership.
Recognition as a role model within their organisation, industry, or regulatory community.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Case summaries (appropriately anonymised), awards or citations, reports, strategic plans, and impact metrics.
Testimonials from executive leadership, regulators, enforcement agencies, or industry peers.
Published articles, media coverage, or speeches highlighting influence or thought leadership.
Official Nominees
Cecilia Akintomide
Nkiru Balonwu
Ije Jidenma
Amina Sambo-Magaji, PhD
Dr. Koranteng
Manet Basson
Professor Ehi Esoimeme
Obadare Peter Adewale
Daniel Yaw Domelevo
Sherifah Tumusiime
Patty Karuaihe-Martin
Governance Risk and Compliance Leadership Award
Governance Risk and Compliance Leader Award
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be judged based on the following key criteria:
1. Strategic Leadership and Vision (25%)
Evidence of leading or driving large-scale financial crime prevention initiatives or transformation programmes.
Influence in setting strategic direction for fraud risk management, AML compliance, investigations, or financial integrity policy.
Visionary leadership in navigating complex or high-risk environments.
2. Operational Impact and Results (20%)
Demonstrable outcomes such as improved fraud detection rates, successful criminal investigations, financial recovery, strengthened controls, or reduced regulatory exposure.
Case examples of operational excellence, enforcement success, or post-incident recovery led by the nominee.
3. Collaboration and Industry Influence (20%)
Active involvement in public-private partnerships, inter-agency collaboration, cross-border initiatives, or industry taskforces.
Contributions to global or regional AML/CTF frameworks, fraud intelligence sharing platforms, or regulatory reform.
4. Innovation and Adaptability (15%)
Introduction or championing of advanced tools, methodologies, or digital solutions (e.g., machine learning for fraud detection, blockchain analytics, KYC automation).
Response to emerging threats such as cyber-enabled financial crimes, crypto fraud, or pandemic-related scams.
5. Advocacy, Mentorship and Capacity Building (10%)
Commitment to mentoring future professionals, building internal capabilities, or influencing a culture of compliance and ethical leadership.
Public speaking, publishing, or educational efforts to promote awareness and resilience.
6. Integrity and Ethical Leadership (10%)
Consistent demonstration of integrity, objectivity, and ethical conduct in decision-making and leadership.
+E1:T1
Recognition as a role model within their organisation, industry, or regulatory community.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Case summaries (appropriately anonymised), awards or citations, reports, strategic plans, and impact metrics.
Testimonials from executive leadership, regulators, enforcement agencies, or industry peers.
Published articles, media coverage, or speeches highlighting influence or thought leadership.
Official Nominees
Dr. Gregory Jobome (Access Bank)
Samantha Padayachee (Vodacom/Vodafone)
Michael Chihande (Revival Holdings)
Christopher Okelune (Revival Holdings)
Jacob Wanjohi (Revival Holdings)
Maryam Ficociello
Hala Shesha
Jessica Robinson
Najwa El Iraki
Adinda Louw
Koranteng Opoku
Osa Aiwerioghene (GTBank)
Cecilia Akintomide
Mmathabo Nkuna
Vincent Mutisya
Nkiru Balonwu
Fred Wasike
Humphrey Muriuki
Beauty Mtonga
Cybersecurity & Data Governance Champion - Leader Award
Cybersecurity & Data Governance Champion - Leader Award
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be assessed based on the following key criteria:
1. Cybersecurity Strategy and Risk Management (25%)
Development and implementation of a robust cybersecurity strategy aligned with enterprise risk and GRC frameworks.
Demonstrated ability to identify, assess, and mitigate cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and incidents across systems and data assets.
2. Data Governance and Compliance Excellence (20%)
Establishment or enhancement of data governance programs that ensure integrity, availability, and confidentiality of information.
Effective alignment with global or regional data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, etc.).
3. Threat Detection, Response and Recovery (15%)
Strong operational performance in cyber threat intelligence, incident detection, response readiness, and business continuity planning.
Examples of successful defence against ransomware, phishing, insider threats, or data breaches.
4. Innovation and Digital Resilience (15%)
Use of cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, zero trust architecture, data loss prevention tools, or blockchain for enhanced cyber and data governance.
Implementation of proactive monitoring, predictive analytics, or automated governance controls.
5. Culture, Awareness & Training (15%)
Initiatives that promote cyber hygiene, data ethics, and compliance awareness across the organisation.
Leadership in conducting enterprise-wide security awareness training, phishing simulations, or ethical data handling programs.
6. Collaboration and Stakeholder Engagement (10%)
Engagement with regulators, industry peers, law enforcement, or sector-specific cyber alliances to drive shared defence and risk intelligence.
Contributions to policy development, public-private threat information sharing, or national security objectives.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Cybersecurity or data governance frameworks, program overviews, risk dashboards, or audit reports (anonymised).
Incident response case studies, awareness campaign materials, or maturity assessments.
Testimonials from internal stakeholders, regulators, clients, or partners.
Metrics demonstrating reduced incidents, improved compliance scores, or enhanced data resilience.
Official Nominees
Sithembile Songo (South Africa)
Prof. Fene Osakwe (Nigeria)
Obadare Peter Adewale (Nigeria)
Anna Collard (KnowBe4 Africa)
Ethel Delali Cofie (Ghana)
Evelyn Namara (Uganda)
Angela Kyerematen‑Jimoh (Ghana)
Sowemimo Abiodun Alex (Nigeria)
Dr. Zoé Cuisin (Bouygues, EMEA)
Joseph Stokes (Telesure, SA)
Christoff Le Roux (Gobid, SA)
Toyosi Odukoya (Nigeria)
Dr. Thierry Wandji (Cybastion CEO)
Andre Biyong (Cybastion COO)
Phillimon Zongo (Multi-award CISO)
These awards recognise organisations that are well into their integrated GRC & Financial Crime Prevention Journey, with a clear integrated GRC & Financial Crime Prevention vision, systems with multiple lines of defense and a high focus on innovation.
Health Sector
Excellence in Healthcare Governance , Risk and Compliance (GRC) & Financial Crime Prevention Excellence Award
Judging Criteria
Entries will be judged against the following core criteria:
1. Governance and Compliance Excellence (25%)
Implementation or enhancement of governance structures, compliance controls, or internal policies aligned with healthcare standards, statutory requirements, and ethical frameworks.
Evidence of successful audits, regulatory inspections, or legal compliance outcomes.
2. Financial Crime and Fraud Prevention (20%)
Measures to detect, prevent, and respond to financial crimes such as procurement fraud, billing fraud, misuse of funding, data breaches, or supplier collusion.
Use of fraud monitoring systems, reporting channels, or collaboration with oversight/regulatory bodies.
3. Risk Management Strategy (20%)
Proactive identification and management of operational, reputational, cyber, clinical, or data protection risks.
Deployment of risk registers, incident tracking systems, or clinical governance frameworks that enhance decision-making and service delivery.
4. Innovation and Improvement (15%)
Use of technology or data-driven solutions (e.g., compliance software, AI risk detection, audit analytics) to enhance GRC or fraud resilience.
Process or system improvements leading to tangible outcomes for governance, assurance, or care quality.
5. Culture of Integrity and Accountability (10%)
Embedding of ethical leadership, transparency, and accountability across the workforce and decision-making.
Initiatives promoting staff training, whistleblower protections, or care ethics in governance practices.
6. Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability (10%)
Collaboration with regulatory bodies, patients, carers, partners, or external auditors to improve risk visibility and oversight.
Sustainable practices that support long-term compliance, trust, and care quality.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Internal governance documentation, policy improvements, audit results, or assurance dashboards (appropriately anonymised).
Testimonials from patients, regulators, or healthcare partners.
Metrics highlighting compliance rates, fraud detection results, or risk mitigation outcomes.
Evidence of technology adoption, training completion, or quality improvement programs.
Official Nominees
Fidson Healthcare Plc (Nigeria)
Smile360 Dental Specialists (Nigeria)
myMedicines (Nigeria)
Nigeria Health Watch
University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital (Nigeria)
Federal Medical Centre, Ebute Meta, Lagos (Nigeria)
Regions Healthcare (Nigeria)
Dr. Muktar Aliyu (Vanderbilt University, USA)
Professor Uche Veronica Amazigo
Chief Varkey Verghese, MFR
Zenith Global Health (Africa)
PharmAccess Foundation (Nigeria)
Anadach Group (USA)
Global Health Project and Resources (Nigeria)
Digital Health Nigeria (DHN)
GE Healthcare (West Africa)
Nigeria Medical Association (NMA)
Health Federation of Nigeria (HFN)
St. Nicholas Hospital
Lagos University Teaching Hospital
AB Specialist Hospital
Duchess International Hospital
Lagos Island Maternity
Eko Hospital
Primrose Hospital
Taal Specialist Hospital
University of Lagos Teaching Hospital
Emzor Pharmaceutical Industries
LASUTH
Ives Hospital
Reddington Hospital
Goldcross Hospital
Angola’s Ministry of Mineral Resources, Oil and Gas
Utilities, Telecos
Excellence in Utility Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC) & Financial Crime Prevention Excellence Award
Judging Criteria
Award Criteria:
Submissions will be assessed against the following key criteria:
1. Governance and Regulatory Compliance (25%)
Evidence of strong corporate governance frameworks aligned with utility sector standards and relevant regulations (e.g., Ofgem, EPA, NERC, ISO standards).
Successful handling of audits, inspections, or compliance reviews and policy implementation that ensure ongoing regulatory alignment.
2. Risk Management and Resilience (20%)
Proactive identification, management, and mitigation of enterprise, operational, ESG, and cyber-related risks.
Implementation of risk registers, scenario planning, or resilience programs that protect critical infrastructure and service delivery.
3. Financial Crime Prevention and Controls (20%)
Effective measures to prevent, detect, and respond to financial crime, procurement fraud, bribery, and misuse of public or corporate resources.
Collaboration with auditors, regulators, or law enforcement on fraud cases, whistleblower protection, or forensic investigations.
4. Innovation in GRC and Security (15%)
Use of technology, data analytics, or digital governance platforms to improve compliance oversight, fraud detection, or real-time risk monitoring.
Development of digital assurance tools, automated controls, or ESG-linked compliance systems.
5. Culture of Integrity and Accountability (10%)
Demonstrated commitment to ethics, transparency, and accountability across teams and leadership.
Internal communication, training, or cultural change programs that strengthen ethical conduct and employee empowerment.
6. Sustainability, ESG and Stakeholder Trust (10%)
Integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risk frameworks within compliance and operational processes.
Engagement with communities, regulators, and stakeholders to promote responsible governance and trust.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Governance frameworks, risk reports, compliance dashboards, fraud case summaries (anonymised), or project documentation.
Audit results, regulatory responses, internal/external testimonials, or sustainability reports.
Metrics showing reduced regulatory breaches, fraud cases, or improved governance maturity.
Case studies of infrastructure protection, ethical procurement, or digital GRC transformation.
Official Nominees
MTN Ghana
Bayobab Group (South Africa)
Vodacom South Africa
MTN Group
Cell C
Orange Egypt & Sofrecom
Telcovas
WIOCC Group
Hormuud Telecom (Somalia)
Avanti Communications
Eskom Holdings SOC Limited (South Africa)
Vodacom
WiSolar (South Africa)
Lilongwe Water Board (Malawi)
Ghana Grid Company (GRIDCo)
Itron International
Ecentric Payment Systems (South Africa)
Dominica Electric Services (Domlec)
CELG (Brazil)
Ethiopia’s Ministry of Water, Irrigation and Energy
Globacom
Airtel
Public Sector/NGOs/Charities
The Excellence in Public Sector Parastatals award
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. Governance and Transparency (25%)
Implementation or enhancement of policies, frameworks, or oversight mechanisms to improve accountability, transparency, and ethical governance.
Demonstrable efforts to reduce bureaucracy, enhance audit readiness, and increase public trust in decision-making processes.
2. Financial Crime Prevention and Control (20%)
Measures taken to detect, investigate, or prevent fraud, corruption, bribery, procurement abuse, or misuse of public funds.
Use of whistleblower frameworks, forensic audits, fraud detection tools, or collaboration with enforcement agencies.
3. Risk Management and Resilience (15%)
Proactive identification and mitigation of institutional, operational, policy, or cyber risks.
Integration of enterprise risk management or crisis response frameworks tailored to public sector challenges.
4. Compliance and Regulatory Excellence (15%)
Alignment with national laws, international standards (e.g., FATF, UNCAC, ISO), and public accountability mandates.
Successful audit outcomes, regulatory reviews, or compliance performance improvements.
5. Innovation in Service Delivery and Oversight (15%)
Implementation of digital tools, data analytics, automation, or AI to support governance, oversight, and fraud detection in public sector operations.
Use of innovation to enhance service quality, transparency, or regulatory reporting.
6. Public Impact, Engagement and Culture (10%)
Engagement with stakeholders, civil society, or beneficiaries to improve transparency and foster a culture of accountability.
Internal ethics campaigns, training programs, or values-driven leadership that empowers staff and promotes good governance.
Supporting Materials (Optional)
Governance frameworks, audit reports, performance dashboards, internal policies, or program summaries (anonymised).
Case studies, investigation outcomes, or fraud prevention campaigns.
Testimonials from oversight bodies, beneficiaries, or civil society organisations.
Public recognition, media features, or legislative acknowledgments.
Official Nominees
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Kenya)
United Nations Public Service Awards (UNPSA)
Batho Pele Excellence Awards (South Africa)
DTPS Forum & Awards (Kenya)
Evaluation Excellence Awards (UNDP)
CIPS Africa Procurement Excellence Awards
Africa Company of The Year Awards (ACOYA)
Internal Audit and Risk Awards (Kenya)
Mo Ibrahim Foundation
Future of Government Awards
Global Excellence Summit and Awards
Africa CISO Summit
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Department of Public Service and Administration (South Africa)
African Union Commission
Nigeria’s Bureau of Public Enterprises
Rwanda Governance Board
Ghana Audit Service
Central Bank of Nigeria
Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC)
Federal Inland Revenue service(FIRS)
Legal & Real Estate
Excellence in Legal and Real Estate Industry / Sector , Governance Risk Compliance and Financial Crime Prevention Awards
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be evaluated against the following key criteria:
1. Regulatory Compliance and Legal Risk Management (25%)
Implementation or enhancement of regulatory compliance systems, legal risk frameworks, or ethical conduct policies.
Evidence of adherence to AML/CFT laws, Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, anti-bribery legislation, and real estate regulatory standards.
2. Financial Crime Prevention (20%)
Successful detection, prevention, or reporting of financial crime such as money laundering, property fraud, third-party corruption, shell company misuse, or transactional red flag identification.
Collaboration with financial intelligence units, regulatory bodies, or law enforcement agencies.
3. Governance and Due Diligence (15%)
Demonstration of robust internal governance structures, transparency controls, and client onboarding risk assessments.
Effective use of compliance checklists, beneficial ownership verification, or source-of-funds tracing in property or legal transactions.
4. Innovation and Technology in Compliance (15%)
Deployment of legal tech, RegTech, property transaction monitoring tools, or automated due diligence platforms to enhance efficiency and regulatory adherence.
Adoption of digital solutions for AML screening, contract risk scoring, or document verification.
5. Ethics, Culture, and Professional Conduct (15%)
Promotion of an ethical workplace culture through training, accountability frameworks, and leadership engagement.
Active support for whistleblower protections, conflict of interest mitigation, and client confidentiality.
6. Industry Collaboration and Impact (10%)
Engagement with industry working groups, regulatory consultations, or legal reform initiatives aimed at strengthening sectoral integrity.
Contributions to raising awareness, training peers, or improving transparency within the legal and real estate industries.
Supporting Materials
Compliance frameworks, case studies, internal audit summaries, anonymised SARs/AML reports, and policy documents.
Evidence of investigations, enforcement actions taken, or improvements in compliance performance.
Testimonials from clients, regulators, or industry peers.
Media coverage, public acknowledgments, or certifications/accreditations.
Official Nominees
ENSafrica
DLA Piper Africa
Bowmans
Aluko & Oyebode (Nigeria)
Webber Wentzel (South Africa)
Katende Ssempebwa & Co. Advocates (Uganda)
Kateera & Kagumire Advocates (Uganda)
Clifford Chance – Africa Practice
Eversheds Sutherland
Herbert Smith Freehills
Redefine Properties (South Africa)
Equites Property Fund (South Africa)
Avison Young South Africa
Growthpoint Properties (South Africa)
Pam Golding Property Group
Cushman & Wakefield | BROLL
Moore South Africa
African Capital Alliance
Broll Property Group
Knight Frank Africa
Energy/Oil& Gas
Excellence in Energy Sector , Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) Award
Governance , Risk and Compliance (GRC) & Financial Crime Prevention Excellence Award
Judging Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. ESG Governance and Integration (25%)
How the initiative is embedded within governance structures, risk management frameworks, and strategic oversight.
Evidence of board-level support, cross-functional collaboration, and leadership accountability for ESG outcomes.
2. Impact and Measurable Results (20%)
Tangible results achieved through the ESG initiative (e.g., improved ESG scores, risk reduction, regulatory compliance, financial integrity, stakeholder trust).
Metrics, KPIs, or case evidence demonstrating success or progress.
3. Innovation and Relevance to GRC or Financial Crime (20%)
Novel approaches linking ESG with compliance, anti-bribery/anti-corruption, AML, transparency, or ethical conduct.
Examples include ESG-related due diligence, climate-related risk disclosures, ethical sourcing, or AI for ESG data governance.
4. Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency (15%)
Involvement of key internal and external stakeholders (e.g., customers, investors, employees, regulators, communities).
Use of ESG reporting frameworks (e.g., GRI, SASB, TCFD, CSRD), disclosures, or third-party assurance.
5. Scalability and Sustainability (10%)
The potential for long-term impact, replication, or scale across business units, jurisdictions, or industry peers.
Integration of continuous improvement or adaptive ESG risk assessment.
6. Ethical Culture and Social Responsibility (10%)
Alignment with broader values of integrity, diversity, inclusion, human rights, environmental protection, and responsible corporate citizenship.
Evidence of how the initiative strengthens organisational culture and ethical conduct.
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
ESG reports, policy documents, board presentations, training materials, performance metrics, or audit results (anonymised as needed).
Case studies, media coverage, stakeholder testimonials, regulator feedback, or third-party ESG ratings.
Certifications (e.g., ISO 14001, B-Corp, UNGC, PRI) or awards received related to the initiative.
Official Nominees
Sonatrach
Tende Energy
Shell
Chevron
Exxon Mobil
Total
NNPC
NAOC
Conoco Philips
Texaco
Stat Oil
Hardy Oil & Gas
Nixen Inc
Addax Petroleum
Petrobras
The Women in Governance, Risk and Compliance Awards honour female leaders demonstrating excellence across GRC. These Awards showcase the role models, advocates and mentors, as well as the inspirational women building and leading in the world of GRC. Please nominate a female leader in any of the Financial Sectors in Nigeria that meets this criteria.
Woman in Financial Crime Prevention
Financial Crime Prevention Woman of the Year
Judging Criteria
Evidence that individual has been successful in leading his/her team , Leader / Champion of Anti-Financial Crime Initiatives in organisation or in professional community promoting innovative solutions, whilst ensuring that your business is complying with the ever-changing landscape when it comes to compliance. The Financial Crime Prevention Woman of the Year Award will recognise an individual working within an organisation that goes above and beyond to ensure anti-financial crime initiatives is at the forefront of the day-to-day running of the business and providing exemplary leadership not only at place or employment as well as in the professional community and Nigeria.
Criteria:
Leadership: The nominee should demonstrate outstanding leadership in the field of financial crime prevention, anti-money laundering (AML), and fraud detection. This includes spearheading initiatives, developing strategies, and leading teams to effectively address financial crime and fraud risks.
Innovation: The nominee should have introduced innovative approaches, technologies, or methodologies to enhance financial crime prevention and fraud detection efforts. This could involve implementing advanced analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, or other cutting-edge solutions to identify and mitigate emerging threats.
Expertise: The nominee should possess a high level of expertise and proficiency in financial crime prevention, AML compliance, and fraud detection practices. This includes a deep understanding of relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge to develop robust compliance programs and detection systems.
Impact: The nominee should have made a significant impact on their organization, industry, or community through their contributions to financial crime prevention and fraud detection. This could be evidenced by the reduction of financial losses, the disruption of criminal activities, or the enhancement of regulatory compliance measures.
Collaboration: The nominee should demonstrate an ability to collaborate effectively with internal and external stakeholders, including law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and industry partners. This includes fostering partnerships, sharing information and best practices, and working together to address common challenges and threats.
Advocacy: The nominee should be actively engaged in advocating for the importance of financial crime prevention, AML compliance, and fraud detection efforts. This could involve raising awareness, promoting education and training, or advocating for policy reforms to strengthen anti-financial crime measures.
Integrity and Ethics: The nominee should uphold the highest standards of integrity, ethics, and professionalism in their work to combat financial crime and fraud. This includes demonstrating honesty, transparency, and accountability in their actions, as well as adhering to legal and regulatory requirements.
Note: Nominations for the Financial Crime Prevention / Anti-Financial Crime & Fraud Woman of the Year Awards are open to women working in various sectors, including banking, finance, law enforcement, regulatory agencies, consulting, and technology. Self-nominations and nominations from peers, colleagues, or industry partners are welcome.
Official Nominees
Funmilayo Ekundayo
Obiageli “Oby” Ezekwesili
Dr. Amina Sambo Magaji
Camila Witt
Juliana Oliveira Nascimento
Rupal Patel
Lisa Osofsky
Alison Taylor
Rachel Wilson
Kelly Donovan
Xolisile Khanyile
Elisa de Anda Madrazo
Sarah Paquet
Alexandra Jour-Schroeder
Rachael Asonibare
Sade Ademokunwa
Temitope Oshikoya
Jane Ayamba
Simisola Ogunlade
Afolabi William Abiodun
Woman in Governance, Risk & Compliance
Governance Risk Compliance (GRC) Woman of the Year. (Financial Sector / Industry)
Judging Criteria
Evidence that individual has been successful in leading his/her team , Champion of Risk & Compliance ethics and Conduct at organisation or in professional community promoting innovative solutions, whilst ensuring that your business is complying with the ever-changing landscape when it comes to compliance. The GRC Woman of the Year Award will recognise an individual working within an organisation that goes above and beyond to ensure compliance is at the forefront of the day-to-day running of the business and providing exemplary leadership not only at place or employment as well as in the professional community and Nigeria.
Criteria:
Leadership: The nominee should exhibit exemplary leadership qualities in driving GRC initiatives within their organization or community. This includes demonstrating vision, strategic thinking, and the ability to inspire others towards achieving GRC objectives.
Innovation: The nominee should have introduced innovative approaches, strategies, or solutions to address GRC challenges effectively. This could involve implementing new technologies, processes, or methodologies to enhance governance, risk management, or compliance practices.
Expertise: The nominee should possess a high level of expertise and proficiency in GRC principles, regulations, and best practices. This includes a demonstrated understanding of relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge effectively in practical settings.
Impact: The nominee should have made a tangible and measurable impact on their organization, industry, or community through their contributions to GRC. This could be evidenced by improvements in governance structures, risk mitigation strategies, compliance programs, or overall organizational performance.
Advocacy: The nominee should be actively engaged in advocating for the importance of GRC and promoting awareness of its significance within their organization, industry, or community. This could involve participating in thought leadership activities, speaking engagements, or mentoring others in the GRC profession.
Diversity and Inclusion: The nominee should demonstrate a commitment to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the GRC profession. This includes fostering a culture of inclusivity, supporting the advancement of women and underrepresented groups in GRC roles, and championing diversity initiatives within their organization or community.
Professionalism and Integrity: The nominee should adhere to the highest standards of professionalism, ethics, and integrity in their GRC practice. This includes demonstrating honesty, transparency, and accountability in their actions, as well as upholding the principles of fairness and justice in all aspects of their work.
Note: Nominations for the GRC Woman of the Year Awards are open to women working in various sectors, including corporate, government, non-profit, and academia. Self-nominations and nominations from peers, colleagues, or industry partners are welcome.
Official Nominees
Adaora Umeoji
Soha El-Turky
Risper Alaro
Adesuwa Okunbo Rhodes
Angela Koech
Odunayo Eweniyi
Fara Ashiru Jituboh
Chilufya Mutale
Yvonne Johnson
Temidayo Salako
Esther Ninsiima Nyinamwiru
Abiola Rasaq
Ada Nduka
Oladiwura Oladepo
Rowena Turinawe
Ann Wyman
Francoise Chan
Joy Chakanyuka
Karine Seguin
Sally Hutton
Beauty Mtonga
These awards are to recognise the media for helping to promote GRC & Financial Crime Prevention.
Media
GRC & Anti-FinCrime Reporter/ Station of the Year
Judging Criteria
Nominations for the GRC & Anti-FinCrime / Financial Crime & Fraud Prevention Reporter or TV Station / Media of the Year Awards are open to individual reporters, journalists, TV stations, newspapers, magazines, online media outlets, and other media organizations that produce exemplary coverage of GRC and financial crime prevention topics. Self-nominations and nominations from peers, industry professionals, or audience members are welcome.
Criteria:
Investigative Reporting: The nominee should showcase excellence in investigative reporting, uncovering significant issues, exposing wrongdoing, and shedding light on critical aspects of GRC and financial crime prevention. This could include in-depth investigations into corporate scandals, regulatory failures, fraudulent activities, or emerging risks impacting businesses and society.
Insightful Analysis: The nominee should provide insightful analysis and commentary on complex GRC issues, regulatory developments, and trends in financial crime and fraud prevention. This could involve offering expert opinions, perspectives from industry insiders, and thought-provoking insights that help audiences understand the implications and significance of key developments in these areas.
Informative Coverage: The nominee should deliver informative and engaging coverage of GRC-related topics, anti-financial crime initiatives, and fraud prevention strategies through various media channels, including print, broadcast, digital, and social media platforms. This could include news articles, feature stories, documentaries, podcasts, webinars, and interactive multimedia content.
Accuracy and Objectivity: The nominee should uphold the highest standards of accuracy, fairness, and objectivity in their reporting, ensuring that information presented is factually correct, balanced, and free from bias or undue influence. This includes conducting thorough research, verifying sources, and presenting multiple perspectives on complex issues.
Impact and Influence: The nominee should demonstrate the impact and influence of their reporting or media coverage on raising awareness, shaping public discourse, and driving positive change in GRC and financial crime prevention. This could be evidenced by tangible outcomes such as policy reforms, regulatory actions, corporate accountability, or public engagement and advocacy efforts.
Audience Engagement: The nominee should actively engage and interact with their audience, fostering dialogue, soliciting feedback, and encouraging participation in discussions related to GRC and financial crime prevention. This could involve responding to audience inquiries, hosting public forums or town hall meetings, and leveraging social media platforms to facilitate engagement and conversation.
Reputation and Recognition: The nominee should have a strong reputation and be recognized as a trusted source of news and information in the GRC and financial crime prevention space. This could be evidenced by industry awards, accolades, audience ratings, and endorsements from peers, industry experts, and stakeholders who value the quality and credibility of their reporting or media coverage.
Official Nominees
Anas Aremeyaw Anas
Manasseh Azure Awuni
Seth Bokpe
John-Allan Namu
Purity Mukami
GroundUp
Oxpeckers Centre for Investigative Environmental Journalism
Ntibinyane Ntibinyane
FrontPage Africa
Macmillan Mhone
LEvenement
VERDADE
The Namibian
La Maison des Reporters
Channels Tv
Arise TV
TVC news
Silverbird Television
Sahara news
David Hundenyin
NTA
Seun Okinbaloye Of Channels TV
Fisayo Soyombo
Kiki Mordi
Ruona J. Meyer
AIT
These awards recognise organisations and individuals that make great strides in embedding governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) to attain principled performance. The award is given to the organisation that shows the real maturity in transiting to the integration between and across the risk management and compliance areas, making risk-aware decisions, and supporting the overall business performance..
Providers
Best GRC & FinCrime Prevention Training Provider of the Year
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be assessed using the following six key criteria:
1. Training Quality and Curriculum Relevance (25%)
High-quality, well-structured, and up-to-date curriculum aligned with global standards (e.g., FATF, ISO, Basel, GDPR, OFAC, FCA, SEC).
Coverage of key topics in GRC, AML/CTF, fraud risk, internal audit, regulatory compliance, ESG governance, cybersecurity, etc.
2. Impact and Outcomes (25%)
Measurable outcomes such as learner certification rates, improvements in organisational compliance, exam pass rates, or positive behavioural change.
Client feedback, success stories, or testimonials validating training effectiveness.
3. Innovation in Delivery (20%)
Use of innovative methods such as e-learning platforms, gamified learning, simulations, scenario-based training, blended learning, or mobile learning apps.
Accessibility, interactivity, and adaptability of training formats for diverse learners or regions.
4. Industry Reach and Sector Engagement (15%)
Breadth of organisations trained (e.g., banks, government agencies, fintechs, law enforcement, corporates).
Contributions to workforce development, certification standards, or public-private capacity-building initiatives.
5. Trainer Expertise and Thought Leadership (10%)
Credentials, experience, and industry influence of trainers, facilitators, or curriculum developers.
Involvement in regulatory forums, publications, or global knowledge-sharing platforms.
6. Commitment to Ethics, Inclusion & Continuous Learning (5%)
Inclusion of ethics, transparency, DEI, and professional integrity themes in training delivery.
Support for ongoing learner development through refresher courses, mentoring, alumni engagement, or career support.
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Course brochures, syllabi, learning outcomes, demo access, or sample content.
Client list (anonymised if needed), learner testimonials, post-training surveys, or evaluation reports.
Awards, accreditations, endorsements, or regulatory recognition (e.g., CPD, ISO 29993, or approval by professional bodies).
Best GRC & Financial Crime Prevention Advisory Service
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be evaluated against the following six key criteria:
1. Client Impact and Value Delivery (30%)
Demonstrated positive outcomes and measurable benefits delivered to clients (e.g., improved compliance posture, regulatory approval, risk reduction, cost efficiency).
Case studies, client testimonials, or before-and-after performance indicators.
2. Service Innovation and Adaptability (20%)
Use of innovative approaches, technology, or methodologies to solve complex compliance and risk challenges.
Flexibility and responsiveness in adapting services to client needs, industry trends, or regulatory changes.
3. Breadth and Depth of Expertise (15%)
Proven knowledge and technical capability in relevant GRC and financial crime domains (e.g., AML, sanctions, ESG, audit, internal controls, RegTech).
Industry credentials, certifications, and experience across regions or regulatory regimes.
4. Quality Assurance and Governance (15%)
Strong internal quality controls, audit mechanisms, and governance standards guiding service delivery.
Ethical conduct, independence, and transparency in client engagements.
5. Thought Leadership and Market Influence (10%)
Contributions to industry knowledge through publications, speaking engagements, advisory boards, or regulatory consultations.
Influence on shaping GRC or financial crime prevention practices within the market.
6. Client Relationship and Trust (10%)
Long-term partnerships and client retention supported by service excellence, responsiveness, and reliability.
Evidence of working as a strategic advisor rather than just a vendor.
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Case studies, service performance dashboards, client testimonials, project summaries (anonymised if necessary).
Certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, ISO 37301), awards, or regulatory endorsements.
Sample deliverables (e.g., risk reports, AML frameworks, remediation plans) or methodologies (proprietary tools, managed service platforms).
Feedback from client satisfaction surveys or renewal data.
Best GRC & Financial Crime Prevention Recruitment & Talents Firm
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be evaluated based on the following six key criteria:
1. Placement Success and Client Impact (30%)
Evidence of successful placements across compliance, risk, audit, AML/CTF, regulatory, governance, or forensic functions.
Demonstrated client satisfaction, retention, and the long-term value of talent placed.
2. Market Knowledge and Specialisation (20%)
Depth of understanding and proven expertise in the GRC and financial crime prevention sector.
Ability to advise clients on talent trends, skills gaps, regulatory needs, and emerging role profiles.
3. Candidate Quality and Experience (15%)
Evidence that placed candidates have added strategic value, enhanced regulatory readiness, or improved risk and compliance performance.
Support provided to candidates (e.g., onboarding, coaching, career development).
4. Innovation and Digital Talent Solutions (15%)
Use of digital platforms, AI-driven sourcing, talent analytics, or proprietary databases to enhance recruitment effectiveness.
Creative talent engagement and pipeline strategies that go beyond traditional search.
5. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Practices (10%)
Initiatives to promote diverse hiring and inclusive representation in GRC and anti-fincrime roles.
Evidence of advising clients or advocating for DEI in risk and compliance leadership.
6. Thought Leadership and Industry Engagement (10%)
Contributions to the broader talent conversation through whitepapers, roundtables, webinars, or professional partnerships.
Participation in industry events or collaboration with regulators, associations, or academic institutions.
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Client testimonials, case studies, or performance metrics (e.g., time-to-fill, retention rates, offer acceptance rates).
Candidate success stories or career progression updates.
Evidence of proprietary tools, DEI programs, talent benchmarking reports, or GRC-focused job market insights.
Awards, certifications, or accreditations (e.g., REC, APSCo, ISO).
GRC & FinCrime Prevention Solution Provider of the Year
Judging Criteria
Nominations will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. Innovation and Originality (25%)
Demonstrated novelty or originality of the solution in addressing a GRC or financial crime prevention challenge.
Distinctive features, architecture, or use of cutting-edge technologies (e.g., AI, blockchain, behavioural analytics, NLP, machine learning, APIs, cloud-native frameworks).
2. Effectiveness and Client Impact (25%)
Tangible results delivered to clients, including improved compliance, risk reduction, automation, cost savings, or regulatory success.
Evidence of adoption across industries or user feedback validating the solution's impact.
3. Usability and User Experience (15%)
Intuitive design, ease of deployment, user adoption rate, and integration capabilities with other systems.
Client-centric functionality, scalability, and performance under operational or regulatory pressures.
4. Alignment with GRC & FinCrime Priorities (15%)
The solution’s direct relevance to key regulatory and operational pain points (e.g., AML screening, audit readiness, third-party due diligence, ESG reporting).
Supports enterprise-wide governance, internal controls, transparency, and real-time risk visibility.
5. Market Influence and Adoption (10%)
Market reach, client base, partnerships, or ecosystem influence in shaping future-ready GRC or financial crime prevention practices.
Deployment success across different sectors, regions, or compliance maturity levels.
6. Thought Leadership and Future-readiness (10%)
Ongoing contribution to the professional community through whitepapers, innovation showcases, webinars, or policy engagement.
Vision for future enhancements, roadmap transparency, and response to emerging threats and regulatory trends.
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Product demos, solution overviews, case studies, or deployment data.
Client testimonials, ROI analysis, or compliance performance metrics.
Awards, certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR compliance), and third-party validations.
Industry collaborations, sandbox participation, or regulatory tech partnerships.
Official Nominees
TymeBank
Chipper Cash
M-KOPA
Paystack
Flutterwave
SovTech
JEC Technologies Group
Azilen Technologies
Dynamic Cyber Group (South Africa)
Google Cloud Platform
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Microsoft Azure
Huawei Cloud
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Nigeria Recruitment
KPMG Nigeria Recruitment
Jobberman
The HR Company
HES Global
First Recruitment Group
Dant Personnel Recruitment
Jobnet Africa
Stanton Chase
Adcorp Group
Yusudi
SeamlessHR
Workforce Africa
Kelly Services
Hire Resolve
Africa Work
Fed Africa
Korn Ferry
Robert Walters Africa
Michael Page Africa
CA Global
Andela
Broll Property Group
Knight Frank Africa
Vanguard Economics
Global Advisors
Khulisa Management Services
MAC Consulting
Letsema
Mazars
Dalberg Advisors
Frost & Sullivan
Oliver Wyman
Bain & Company
Accenture Africa
PwC Africa
KPMG Africa
Deloitte Africa
EY-Parthenon
Gebeya
Moringa School
Andela
Decagon
African Management Institute (AMI)
Lagos Business School (LBS)
Strathmore University
NigeriaI Institute of Information Technology (NIIT)
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
McKinsey & Company
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN)
Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria (CIBN)
Microsoft Africa
ALX Africa
African Leadership University (ALU)
Blosson Academy
Regenesys Business Schol
Management College of Southern Africa (MANCOSA)
Eastern and Southern African Management Institute (ESAMI)
ADvTECH Group
Silwood School of Cooker
Edstellar
Sama
Shining Hope for Communities (SHOFCO)
Cellulant
Andela
SeamlessHR
Persistent Systems
Datacube Analytics
HuBTech
Youverify
Oracle Financial Services
SecureID
Leadership Awards for supporting and promoting these initiatives by demonstration of exemplary leadership, implementing effective Governance, Anti-Financial Crime / AML and complying with statutory laws, regulations and standards in their various states (Public sector) in the Country.
Lifetime Achievement Awards
Lifetime Achievement Awards
Judging Criteria
The award will be conferred based on the following six core criteria:
1. Distinguished Career Contributions (30%)
A track record of sustained and influential contributions to GRC, compliance, or financial crime prevention across a lifetime of service.
Pioneering initiatives, frameworks, or reforms that have had national, regional, or global significance.
2. Leadership and Legacy (25%)
Recognised as a visionary leader or catalyst for positive change in organisations, industries, or regulatory systems.
Mentorship of future leaders, institutional reform, or capacity-building that leaves a lasting legacy.
3. Advocacy and Ethical Commitment (15%)
Promotion of ethics, transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption as central tenets of professional practice.
Standing up for public interest, whistleblower protections, or systemic integrity.
4. Global or Sectoral Influence (10%)
Contributions that influenced cross-border standards, sectoral best practices, international cooperation, or multilateral dialogue.
Recognition by peers, governments, professional bodies, or industry leaders.
5. Thought Leadership and Knowledge Advancement (10%)
Publications, speaking engagements, academic contributions, or policy input that has advanced the field intellectually or practically.
Development of educational or professional standards in GRC or financial crime prevention.
6. Awards, Honours & Recognition (10%)
Previously received awards, appointments, citations, or honorary roles that reflect the individual’s influence and reputation.
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Career summary or biography.
List of notable achievements, reforms, published works, or programs led.
Testimonials from peers, institutions, regulators, mentees, or beneficiaries.
Public recognitions, previous awards, citations, or board appointments.
